Well, Well, Well ... Look Who's a Big Fake

57227522websters420200915827PM.jpg It's just now come out that Miss California Carrie Prejean, the new face of homophobia, got breast implants just weeks before the Miss USA pageant. Because the sanctity of marriage is so important but apparently not the sanctity of having real titties.

In an interview on "The Early Show," Keith Lewis, the co-Director of the Miss California Pageant, admitted to helping Prejean get the boob job.

"We assisted when Carrie came to us and voiced the interest in having the procedure done," Lewis told "Early Show" co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez.

"We want to put her in the best possible confidence in order to present herself in the best possible light on a national stage." (Source)

Well that worked like a charm now, didn't it? The only way she could have presented herself in less of a "best possible light" is if she would have come out for the interview portion of the competition wearing a nazi uniform. And then you wouldn't have even been able to see the implants, so that would have been pointless anyway.

More of the reason why you can't put lipstick on a pig at something called the Dove Awards last week:

57261580websters51200993941AM.jpg57261592websters51200993959AM.jpg57261596websters51200994005AM.jpg57261897websters51200993947AM.jpg











31 Comments


Ken B said:

well, i guess if some readers were wondering about your own views they just got a pretty stern confirmation that not only do you chug cock but you have zero tolerance for anyone who doesnt also chug cock or at least completlt lay down their own beliefs in an effort to further your cock chuggin agenda! jesus, i dont agree with her statements but fuck man, THEY ARE HER OWN! let it freakin go, i get it already, gays are people too... whateve. news flash fuck, i dont know your gay until you shove it in my face, you dont want to be hassled for it dont make it a fuckin issue. its not like being black or fat or tall or short... its only what you do in your room asshole, gay isnt a lifestyle, its how you fuck AND THATS IT! i like the color green, i want my own special personal rights now, privileges that others dont have just because i crave the attention....... green lovers unite!!


Kolby said:

Hey, Ken B., maybe you should eat a dick.


Stacey said:

What are you even talking about? Are you trying to say that you have to be gay to think Carrie Prejean is an idiot? Oh, and I'm not, by the way. And I'm also a girl.


Alli said:

Hopefully he will choke on it


Kathleen said:

Hey, I resent that, Ken B. And so does my husband's dick.

(By the way, should I mention that I'm female, or should I just go ahead and let your head explode first?)


D said:

Angry much?

It just shows that life is all about semantics. The sanctity of marriage argument is based on one's personal belief which is based on one's myopic view of the world. There's not much wrong with that (aside from close-mindedness) until, however, one tries to force that singular view on someone who holds an entirely different view. Then we're talking about tyranny to a degree in the essence of forcing another to act and think according to the "King."

I could easily allow Prejean her personal views and agree to disagree with them. However, now she has joined the crusade to literally persecute another human being for their views because they are different than her own. Now she is fair game for criticism and ridicule. The fact that she believes it's not ok to live and love and legally wed as a homosexual couple, but totally acceptable to alter her body to suit her needs is just hypocritical. But it's based on semantics. She believes one is ok, while the other is not. Expanding on Jefferson's view on religion that so long as it doesn't break my leg or pick my pocket what does it matter to me what my neighbor believes, it seems all Prejean, and apparently Ken B, need do is alter their perception, widen their minds. I'm sure they'll find that there are real dangers out there - for instance, intolerance. You know, like what the terrorists have.


Jules said:

The Ken dude needs to chill. I am a straight female that is married and I think Ken and Miss Cal are both idiots. Can someone please tell me how two men getting married effects my marriage? I always seem to miss that. Good post Stacey.


mAGGIE said:

wE ARE NOT IN AN ALTERNATE UNIVERSE HER VIEWS ARE CORRECT. WE ARE BACK TO THE GOD DIDNT MAKE ADAM AND STEVE SO DONT TRY TO BELITTLE THE GIRL FOR HER TRUTH ABOUT THE SANCITY OF MARRIAGE. YOU GAYS ARE TRYING TO TALK EVERYONE INTO BELIEVING YOUR VIEWS ARE RIGHT I PTTY YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE BEING DECIEVED SADLY. THYE SHOULD MAKE AN ISLAND SOMEWHERE WHERE YOU CAN ALL GO AND LEAVE THE REST OF US NORMAL PEOPLE ALONE WE DONT WANT GAY MARRIAGE..


Jadine said:

Ken is an angry little man, isn't he.


TryScience said:

"You gays are trying to talk everyone into believeing your views are right..."

...and what are YOU doing, Miss "Her Views Are Correct"?


snapnhiss said:

Anyone else notice bitch has man pits?

Oh my god, do you think Carrie's transgender? That would explain so much.


Another Jen said:

Oh wow, I haven't heard the "you should all go live on an island somewhere" argument since the last major civil rights movement in this country. That's some good old-fashioned hate right there! Thanks for making our point, mAGGIE (you fucking twat).


Ken B said:

the above comments make it understandable the sad state of things today, i am not angry nor bitter about gay or not gay, married or not married. when you go back and listen to her actual comments she went out of her way to state that is was HER belief that marriage should be between man/woman ect, she even apologetically said 'no of fence' to those who thought otherwise. my concern is more for how she has been attacked and called everything from an idiot to a wicked cunt, all for publicly expressing her beliefs. we all get to do if from the anonymity of hiding behind a computer... MY point is really very simple, why is there even a need for 'special rights' for gays?? as i said before. i cant discriminate against what i dont know about! stop shoving your sexual preference in my face and i cant/wont be able to treat you any differently! if i choose to bang a sheep do i get to scream it loudly from the rooftops, dress differently and get additional rights? how about protection from public opinion that may differ from my own? can i sue a potential employer if i dont get a job after telling them i bang sheeps? the fact is, if i keep it to myself, its not an issue.... chug cock, eat bush, strap it on whatev! I DONT REALLY CARE, jus dont make me deal with it cause its your thing not mine and dont hate me if i dont share your beliefs!


True_Blue said:

[Kicking aside the ALL-CAPS typing, incoherent bigots]--do you suppose she was born with that nose? I mean, it's too small and short for her face. Given that her boobs are fake, how about her nose? A bad nose job?


Jadine said:

The fact is Ken B and mAGGIE, you are spewing hateful garbage. In case you hadn't noticed, this is a satyrical site. How about we ship all of the "NORMAL" people off to an island together and they can live in hate happily ever after? I would also like it if heterosexual people would stop shoving their sexuality in my face. And Ken, if you would like to bang a sheep and scream it loudly from the roof tops, power to you. I'm not gay but I do believe that we all have the right to equality and that we are all human beings. I don't think gays are asking for "special rights", just the same rights that you and I have.


Ken B said:

gays HAVE the same rights, they are called 'basic human rights'. spewing hateful garbage?? well, i really dont expect you to know the difference but... this IS a satirical site yes, but when opinion veers into actual hate it stops being funny, even for a cynic like me. if i say gays are wrong or even worse, heretical and will all go to hell blah blah blah, i will get blasted with every name there is. if i dont lay down my own personal beliefs and fall in line with the homo agenda i get blasted as well... my point was only that the poor, albeit fake titted, young girl has been tortured because she didnt worship at the alter of gay, she has an opinion that is different and is being destroyed for it. hmmmmm, i would think that the gays themselves would be a lil more understanding, dare i say... tolerant of others beliefs, i mean since everyone has been so agaisnt them for so long. or is it their time to get back at the world at large????


Ken B said:

i do understand, Stacey, that you find it necessary to jump on the hate Prejean train cause its the thing to do and all. hey, you gotta site to run and you need to pander to your readers limited ability to think for themselves but... when you mention the whole NAZI uniform thing you take it all to another lever. thats what gets me going, its like if you dont completely agree with gays you must be some nazi, terrorist, baby seal clubbing neanderthal.... what the???? she IS an idiot, she wasnt prepared well (shes a pagent contestant, hellooo) and shes a hypocrite, but not a NAZI...


Jadine said:

I think everyone has a right to their opinion. And don't jump on Stacey and her readers. If you want to read comments where the readers have a "limited ability to think for themselves", then go to TMZ. You have insulted Stacey and most of the commenters here today because we don't agree with you and you didn't like her post. It's just like when there is something on T.V. that you don't enjoy or agree with, change the fucking channel. You just have to simply click the x in the top right corner and it's gone.

Have a great weekend everyone.


Stacey said:

Uhhh, yeah. I think you're missing the point. I do have a site to run, a website where I effectively make fun of celebrities. Carrie Prejean is, for all intent and purposes, a celebrity. Thusly, I make fun of her. I'm not, however, comparing her to a nazi. The nazi line was what I like to call a little "humor device," because she didn't portray herself in "the best possible light," in fact, it was the complete opposite as far as the majority of the country is concerned. Therefore, I was saying that's how it potentially could have been worse.

So if you don't get all that -- if that can't squirm its way into your thick little skull -- then this site may not be your cup of tea.


Ken B said:

jadine, you are of course right, very right... i see the errors of my ways now, no longer will i strive to have an opinion of my own, please tell me what to think and how to feel... i have erred.... sieg heil, jadine, sieg heil...


julia said:

yeah, how dare homosexuals want SPECIAL PRIVILEGES like, you know, being permitted to marry like any other tax-paying law-abiding citizen of this country. THE NERVE.


Look at all the fun I missed out on. I think we're losing sight of what's important here.

You know what bothers me about her? Her insistence that her opinion is Biblically correct. I want to ask her what part of the Bible says it's correct to get a boob job and flaunt it in a bikini for men to drool over. Oh and her reference to my right to chose an "opposite marriage". Why can't any of these girls speak English?


lucy said:

Holy shit, Ken B and mAGGIE, where the hell did you come from? Why are you on this site? Ken B, you said:

i cant discriminate against what i dont know about! stop shoving your sexual preference in my face and i cant/wont be able to treat you any differently! if i choose to bang a sheep do i get to scream it loudly from the rooftops, dress differently and get additional rights?

Why should heterosexuals be able to parade their sexual preference everywhere, but the moment homosexuals do, they're compared to someone who "bang[s] sheep"?

And how exactly are they getting additional rights, if all they want to do is marry the person they love? Last I knew, that wasn't an "additional" or "special" right. It's EQUAL rights, you fucktards.

If you are so keen on this banishment island shit, why don't we build one for all you homophobes? You can happily reside with the racists and sexist pigs. That way the evolved world can live in peace.


SusanC said:

I'm not sure whether it amuses me or saddens me that there are A) people who are working up into a frenzy about how the possibility of "gay marriage" can somehow tear apart the moral fabric of society (yawn) and B) that they are posting their concerns on what is a gossip site, as opposed to a serious website, where such weighty matters are discussed and presumably opinions can be altered (yah, right).

I guess I'll be amused. And for the record, as a Californian, I can personally there must be at least 1 million more attractive state residents than Ms. Prejean, even without considering her opinions. Her eyes are almost as dead as Paris Hilton's.

Susan (A married hetero woman, for what its worth).


Ken B said:

um, last point i swear. marriage, to any one or thing is not a right, its a privledge. no where in the constitution, bible, or anywhere else is mankind, er i mean peoplekind issued the birthright of marriage! i do apologize for ruffling y'alls feathers and as far as insulting folks well thats just plain wrong, i mean as Stacey said herself, this is a site built and profiting from 'making fun' of others and by others of course that means those that dont agree with the special lil 'cool kid club' you folks got here... its wrong to hate yes, UNLESS it would seem, your hate is diriected toward those who hate! yeah, its ok to hate them, they dont agree with us so they should be hated... its ok to say that heidi should get swine flu and DIE, simply because she is perhaps the most annoying person alive. annoying yes, but she should die? a person wishing DEATH on another and then being offended at my lil remarks??? jadine, even if you are Stacey's mom, which would make sense come to think of it, you dont have the RIGHT to be offended at my remarks, you have the right to not agree but being offended, especially on someone else's behalf is just as rediculous as anything i said. you all have fun in your little hate filled world, making fun of and wishing death upon those that so deserve it, if only because they have things you cant ever have...


Nudgie said:

Dang KenB ....

Take it up the ass much?


socalledonlycousins said:

marriage, to any one or thing is not a right, its a privledge. no where in the constitution, bible, or anywhere else is mankind, er i mean peoplekind issued the birthright of marriage!

If you weren't obviously ignorant and wrong before, this statement confirms that you don't know much about the laws of your own country. Marriage absolutely is a right, as any heterosexual couple can dramatically increase their social standing by getting married. Marriage is protected by so many laws and court rulings in this country they're beyond count.

People get tax breaks for being married; being married makes it easier to adopt children; being married is a protected status under job discrimination laws in many states; the Supreme Court has ruled that married status is protected under the Equal Protection Clause.

Or you could just listen to the countless soundbites from your Congress and state legislatures about how marriage is a fundamental right between a man and a woman. They say it all the time, so obviously most of the government disagrees with you.

It's this simple: Homos are entitled to exactly the same quantum of rights AND PRIVILEGES that heteros get, no more, no less. To disagree with that is exactly the same as saying black people shouldn't have the same as white people. It's bigotry, and there's just no arguing around that.


socalledonlycousins said:

Oh, and mAGGIE: I guess you forgot to turn on the CAPS-LOCK for the first letter, huh? You're a dumbfuck bigot. End of discussion.

Oh, could you not hear that because it wasn't yelled in ALL CAPS YOU MISERABLE FUCKING IDIOT? YOU'RE A DUMBFUCK BIGOT. IT'S THE SEX YOU'RE HAVING WITH YOUR RELATIVES THAT'S EVIL, NOT GAYNESS DUMBASS.


socalledonlycousins said:

A little readily available information about the U.S. Supreme Court's view of marriage.

In another case, Zablocki v Redhail (1978), the Court struck down a Wisconsin law that barred marriage rights to people who hadn't paid their child support. The Court explicitly stated that marriage is "a fundamental right" under the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause.

In the famous case Loving v Virginia (1967), the Court struck down Virginia's ban on interracial marriage on the ground that the Virginia law violated the Equal Protection Clause and interfered with "the fundamental freedom" of marriage.


Diablo said:

Here's a solution...do away with marriage. It doesn't exist in a form near to what people think it does. We have an incredibly high divorce rate and lets be completely honest here...how is a gay couple going to do anymore damage to the "Sanctity" of marriage than say...Britney Spears, Elizabeth Taylor, That drummer from Motley Crew, Donald Trump...I could go on. The only reason people do get married, and they can try to full themselves all they want that its about love, is because there are government recognized benefits. Do away with them and watch the rate of marriage, and not surprisingly, the rate of divorce drop. Marriage is a fucked up institution anyway. My folks have 47 years under their belt, live in the same house, and maybe say three words to each other annually.


Ken B said:

ah, and there it is..."that is exactly the same as saying black people shouldn't have the same as white people. It's bigotry, and there's just no arguing around that." gays are the new 'black people' and thus should be protected from the entire world of people that CHOOSE not to chug cock or strap one on. soon enuf will come the quotas for employers, schools ect...