freckles aren't "hideous". She's redhaired, of course she's gonna have freckles. I expect your body is absolutely gorgeously perfect, with no marks of any kind on your skin? No, I didn't think so.

^ having said that, you're right, her boobs are really quite saggy.

I don't know..I'm with W.I.M.B. on this one....being a fair skinned person myself, i know that some freckling is inevitable but can mostly be prevented with some SPF. look at her skin and the places she has freckles---she looks like shes been running around naked with no sunblock for the last 5 years.

her skin, like the rest of her, just looks like it hasn't been taken care of.

The worst about the skin aren't the freckles, it's the fact she has no muscle tone whatsoever. Her boobs don't look bad to me though, at least they look natural.

But true, this photoshoot was a bad idea, she obviously just wants the attention.

Aarggh I hate it when people make me defend this useless waste of space, but her breasts are NOT saggy. They're big, and REAL, which means that the, uh, actual 'boobage' will hang away from the body, rather than be bolted to her chest like two orange halves. Look at the nipples, pointing up, up, up! Gorgeous. BritBrit's, on the other hand...

That being said, whatever genius decided freaking Hohan would be a good follow-up to Marilyn Monroe should be shot.

Fuck it. I'd suck on 'em.

Hell, I might even as far to bite one of Lindsay's nipples completely off. Just to digest it.

And the freckles. You could scrub those things off with a couple #2 strength erasers.

Go as far to*

Nutsac.

I'm with pinknblack on this one. This is what REAL boobs look like when not being held up by a bra. If you like 'em large, this is what they look like naked. Does no one watch retro porn?

The only way to have large, naked, AND perky boobage is to have implants. Probably hard, too-big-for-her-frame implants. Gross.

Of course, having said that, these photos-as-photos are HIDEOUS. I seriously thought this was Heidi Montag until I read the words below. Lindsay is seriously unattractive in the face here.

She is not even remotely worthy to do homage to Marilyn.

That being said, the boobs aren't bad--they look much like mine except I have bigger, browner nipples. And my boobs are fab.

As others have said, I'm no Lohan fan, but that's what REAL, considerably large breasts look like. Plus, her posture is a little weird and hunchback-ish in the banner shot, making it seem as though they're "saggier" than they really are.

I'm getting a bit tired of bloggers (and readers) bashing celebrities for having normal bodily traits. It's one thing to talk shit on a celebrity who's crazy, stupid, untalented, mean spirited, etcetera. However, it's quite another to get bitchy over someone's freckles, pale skin, pubic hair, minor cellulite, and the like. Who cares? Not everyone feels the need to be bleached and waxed and prodded into "perfection."

I'm sorry, but this isn't just any "celebrity"---it's Lindsay fucking Lohan and if she doesn't want someone picking on her body flaws then she shouldn't have spent the last few years being half naked everywhere.

There is nothing wrong with having a "normal" body---we all have them. But if you don't want to invite criticism put on some clothes.

Me-ow. Those are called "real boobs" Who cares that they don't look like Dr. Rey hasn't called them adorable and lifted them to her chin? Also no talkin' shit about freckles, thats irrelevant to the fact that she's a talentless whore that has been pimped out by her skanky mother and has been in photo shoots comparing her first Liz Taylor and then Marilyn Monroe.

Oh bitch please. Lindsey, your fifteen minutes are certainly ticking.

Um...I know everyone is kinda like "Booooobies" at the moment, but could I draw everyone's attention to a minor detail that people seem to have overlooked?

First, look at the last photo. The photo where she is holding the red and white sheet out, where she is looking to her right. Now look down. Now look at her hips.

Why is it doing that?! Hips aren't supposed to do that!

...Is anyone not as disturbed as I am about that dent in her side?

Are you SERIOUS!? Seriously, I'm completely flabbergasted by this post. I think Lindsay is as talentless and annoying as the next person (seriously, I have no respect for her at all), but freckles aren't "hideous," and her breasts are really nice. They're not saggy at all. You must look absolutely fabulous naked to say something like that, especially in such a public place. Do you think at all about the effect your words may have on people reading them, particularly when they are just not true at all? You're contributing to an absolutely horrible, shameful aspect of our society. Congratulations.

Thank you, Grace. But as a matter of fact, no I don't look absolutely fabulous naked. And guess what? My tits sag, too! But the difference between me and Lindsay Lohan is that while I sit in my bathroom for hours at a time crying and drawing on my breasts with a sharpie as to determine what I'd change -- Lindsay poses naked for a major publication trying to pull off a something already done (much, much better) by a far classier lady.

And that, my friends, is why she is subject to ridicule; and myself (or any of you, for that matter) are not.

All natural baby, that's how I like 'em. Swing low sweet chariots.

I can appreciate that perspective, Stacey, but don't you see how publicly criticizing lovely breasts and cute freckles like those is contributing toward a culture in which perfectly beautiful girls really do sit in front of the mirror for hours crying and drawing on themselves with sharpies?

I honestly don't think there is anything "cute" about lindsay lohan. she is a worn out mess and she has no one to blame for this but herself. im a decade older than she is, yet she looks older than my mom.

and frankly, i think if young women are coming to entertainment blogs looking for self esteem role models, they are already mentally standing on some unsteady ground.

i think the "all women's bodies are beautiful" is a great argument---but direct it somewhere that matters, not a celeb gossip site.

Um, that's exactly my point. Young girls with shaky self esteem ARE looking at sites like this. Gossip sites are PRECISELY the kind of thing that insecure teenage girls look at on the internet. This is EXACTLY where it matters.

see i think this is where we have to agree to disagree.
and for the record, i think your points are valid and i hate the way women are portrayed and judged by the media. I'm not disagreeing with you about that.

but i also dont think there is anything wrong with picking on a washed up celeb who has done nothing of any value since Mean Girls. lohan, in any state of dress or undress, shouldnt be a role model for anyone. this girl looks BAD, and she looks this way because she does (or did) a lot of drugs, a lot of drinking, and a lot of partying. it's all taken a toll on her body and i don't want to see her naked.

Not to be a smartypants, but trust me when I say gossip sites are not the kind of thing teenage girls are looking at on the internet. Gossip sites are what bored people with desk jobs are looking at on the internet. Teenage girls have much more pressing business on myspace, facebook, and whatever else I'm not even hip enough to know about in the first place.

What does her personal life have to do with the fact that you guys are picking on her boobs (for looking the way they should, might I add)?
So if this was...I don't know...Natalie Portman instead of LiLo, would the title of this article still be called "Saggers?" I call shenanigans.

I'm only 22, so I'm actually fairly well-versed in the activities of teenage girls, if you'll forgive me for saying so, Stacey. If you think they aren't experts on everything Lindsay Lohan, you've got another thing coming. I'm hip enough to know about it.

TMJ: Do you really think that teenage girls aren't reading gossip sites? That's crazy. Believe, like I just said, I'm BARELY not one. I'm also in no way saying that Lindsay is anything but a vacuous and irreponsible bore. But how do you think calling her lovely boobs "saggers" and freckles "hideous" makes any freckly, normal-boobed girl with shitty self esteem feel? Pretty crappy.

kim: Lohan's personal life is directly responsible for the way her body looks. Natalie Portman takes care of herself, and looks it.
I never made a comment of any kind about her boobs. I said, if you go to the beginning of this god forsaken piece which has already taken up too much of my time, that "her skin, like the rest of her, just looks like it hasn't been taken care of."

Grace: Who are these teenage girls that are looking up to Lohan or even want to have their bodies compared to hers? Most people don't want to have the body of a crack whore. And along your line of reasoning, I don't think that young girls would go to a site like this one because it mostly BASHES celebs. Why would you visit a site that regularly makes fun of the people you look up to? I would think they would stick to a more mainstream site like OMG!.

Hahaha, teenage girls aren't mentally handicapped Lohan-worshippers. I LIVE in that world. Teenagers are bashing Lindsay Lohan, too. What I'm saying is that knowing about celebrities and visiting gossip sites is a part of teenage culture. Bashing Lindsay Lohan and people like her is part of teenage culture. That doesn't mean it doesn't perpetuate a society of shitty expectations to pretend like beautiful breasts are unattractive and freckles are something to be ashamed of, no matter who the boobs and freckles belong to.

okay, this is the last time i'm gonna post on this piece because im tired and i feel as if im becoming a broken record.

i actually used to really like lohan. i thought she was awesome in Mean Girls, awesome as an actress and awesome as an example of what a healthy, sexy, REAL body looked like...but i don't think that anymore. i don't think her breasts ARE attractive, not because they may/may not appear to sag, but because they are attached to HER body, which to me, looks worn out. she has aged incredibly in a short period of time.

I don't think it's asking too much to assume that if a celeb wants to do a naked photo shoot, they should probably do a little work in the weeks leading up to said photo shoot to help them look their best. and by "a little work" i mean nothing more than cutting out the mimosa's at breakfast.

having said all that, once again i want to reiterate that i agree with you that the expectations put on female celebs are unfair and wrong. but i also think that celebs need to take some amount of personal responsibility, especially if they want to appear nude.

People! Look at her lack of hips! Breasts of every shape and kind are normal, inverted hips are not!

Why am I the only one who's noticed this?

I'm all for LiLo bashing, but jesus christ, leave the poor bitch's genetics alone! She can't help freckles, or her large natural breasts! People complain about all the fake shit in hollywood, yet can't wait to jump all over someone for how they look naturally.

And I seriously doubt anyone at WIMB or any of the commenters here are Heidi Klums, or Tyson Beckfords.

assholes.